Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
III) Within the version of the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Variation) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed on the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.In accordance with the EPA fee schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be meant for redistribution about the internet or for commercial purposes.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day while in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged occurrence as well as the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to be the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react in any way towards the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak style of evidence which may be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners alongside one another with a motorcycle at four.
12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons obtaining their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to try and do away with the candidature click here of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts for your purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity during the pay scale allowances of Stenographers within the District Judiciary is during the clear negation of the legislation laid down by the Supreme Court in its several pronouncements. Read more
If a victim is shot at point-blank assortment, it may well still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that will not be always the case.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a possibility of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
department concerned shall give the complete list of ACRs with the concerned officer to DPC nicely in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
Please note, In case you are seeking a payment exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Case law, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is vital for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and marketing transparency.
PACER allows anybody with an account to search and Identify appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for a PACER account.
90 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion could be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual duration of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for getting to be entitled being deemed for promotion into a higher grade, of course, is just not without logic since the officer who is at first inducted to the particular post needs to provide over the reported post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to serve the public inside a befitting way.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]